Nyasasaurus – the worlds oldest dinosaur?

THE STORY (via Sky News)

The first dinosaur to have walked the Earth may have been discovered by researchers in the corridors of London’s Natural History Museum.

A mysterious fossil specimen that has been in the museum’s collection for decades has now been identified as most likely coming from a dinosaur that lived about 245 million years ago – 10 to 15 million years earlier than any previously discovered examples.

It has been named Nyasasaurus parringtoni after southern Africa’s Lake Nyasa, now called Lake Malawi, and Cambridge University’s Rex Parrington, who collected the specimen at a site near the lake in the 1930s.

“It was a case of looking at the material with a fresh pair of eyes,” Paul Barrett from the Natural History Museum, who worked on the study, said.

“This closes a gap in the fossil record and pushes back the existence of dinosaurs.”

The London fossil was studied by researchers in the 1950s but no conclusion was reached and nothing was published.

“It was a mystery … It just became this mythical animal,” Mr Barrett added.

Two features of the London fossil, together with a similar sample subsequently spotted at the Iziko South African Museum in Cape Town, are strong evidence that the animal belongs with the dinosaurs, the researchers said.

The bone tissues in the upper arm show marks of rapid growth, common in dinosaurs.

They also have a feature known as an elongated deltopectoral crest that anchored the upper arm muscles which is unique to dinosaurs.

“Although we only know Nyasasaurus from fossil fragments, the anatomy of its upper arm bone and hips have features that are unique to dinosaurs, making us confident that we’re dealing with an animal very close to dinosaur origin,” Mr Barrett said.

The researchers believe Nyasasaurus probably stood upright, was one metre tall at the hip, and up to three metres long from head to tail.

Sterling Nesbitt, of the University of Washington, who led the study, published in the journal Biology Letters, said: “What’s really neat about this specimen is that it has a lot of history.

“Found in the 30s, first described in the 1950s … now 80 years later, we’re putting it all together.”

THE VERDICT

I love this piece! Finally a bit of news that isn’t mundane, boring, sad or war related!!

It fascinates me that dinosaurs roamed the earth for MILLIONS of years at least 65 million years ago! AND that we can study them, estimate height and weight, study their eco systems based on plant fossils etc.

This fossil is 10-15 millions years OLDER than any other fossil ever found. I have a fossil in my house of a Woodlouse, or ‘Trilobite’ from 400 million years ago… When I hold it in my hand, it’s quite a strange feeling to know this about it, to try and understand it was once a living creature that roamed when dinosaurs were walking the earth.

Mind blowing. I hope that they find more fossils relating to the Nyasasaurus and can build up a better picture of the animal.

Portmans’ Pics are Photoshopped?.. NO WAY! Ha!

The Story
A Christian Dior mascara ad featuring Natalie Portman has been banned for exaggerating the effect of the product on her lashes
Dior is criticised for Photoshopping the mascara advertAn advert for Christian Dior mascara featuring Natalie Portman has been banned for exaggerating the effect of the product on her lashes.

The magazine advert showed a picture of the Oscar-winning actress with the text: “Lash-multiplying effect volume and care mascara.

“The miracle of a nano brush for an unrivalled lash creator effect. It delivers spectacular volume-multiplying effect, lash by lash.”

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) investigated the ad after rival cosmetics firm L’Oréal complained that it misleadingly exaggerated the likely effects of the product.

Dior defended the campaign, saying it had not received any complaints from consumers and believed this meant the advert did not exceed likely expectations of the mascara.

But it admitted Star Wars actress Portman’s natural lashes had been digitally retouched in post-production using Photoshop software.

Natalie Portman
Portman’s natural lashes were retouched

It said the retouching was “primarily used to separate/increase the length and curve of a number of her lashes and to replace/fill a number of missing or damaged lashes”.

A “minimal amount” of retouching also took place to increase the thickness and volume of a number of her natural lashes, it said.

The ASA said Dior provided some before and after photos showing a model’s natural eyelashes and the effects of the product on her lashes.

But it said it had not seen any evidence of the mascara’s effects on Portman’s lashes where there had not been any post-production retouching.

It concluded the advert was likely to mislead and ruled it could not appear again in its current form.

The Verdict

Seriously? They’ve banned it?……..

We all know that the adverts any cosmetics company puts out is airbrushed to death, fine tuned to make the product look more appealing to the public.

You’re not just buying the product, you’re buying into the brand and the celebrity or model who is selling it. That’s the whole point of advertising. None of it is genuinely real. If you had a celebrity posing in a magazine with genuine makeup on, not retouched, I could say I probably wouldn’t buy a product.

They either need to set some regulations in the world of advertising for cosmetics, or just leabe Dior alone and not ban the advert.

An Apple a day…

The Story (via Sky News)

Apple has unveiled a smaller version of its iPad tablet computer as it increases its rivalry with Amazon, Google and Samsung.

The iPad mini is about two-thirds of the size of the full-size model and the cheapest option will cost £269, making it more expensive than alternatives.

Marketing chief Phil Schiller launched the new device, which will be available to pre-order from October 26 and sold from November 2, in San Jose, California.

“It’s not just a shrunken down iPad, it’s an entirely new design,” he said. “Others have tried to make tablets smaller than the iPad and they have failed miserably.

“The technology inside is equal to, if not better to, the iPad 2 in every way.”

Chief executive Tim Cook presided over the launch of what is considered his first Apple product not bearing the thumbprint of late co-founder Steve Jobs, who derided small tablets.

The iPad Mini next to a full-sized iPad
The iPad mini next to the full-sized model

The gadget is 7.9in (20cm) high and weighs 0.68lbs (0.3kg) – half as much as the normal iPad. At 0.3ins (7.2mm), it is also as thin as a pencil.

The screen resolution is 1024 by 768 pixels, the same as the iPad 2 and a quarter of the resolution of the third-generation iPad.

Experts had expected the smaller tablet to be priced similarly to rival devices the Google Nexus 7 and the Amazon Fire – which are £70 and £110 cheaper respectively.

In another surprise, Apple said it was upgrading its full-size iPad tablet just six months after launching a new model, while doubling the speed of the processor.

Previously, the company has updated the iPad once a year.

The fourth-generation iPad will have a better camera and work on more LTE wireless data networks around the world.

Apple is also replacing the 30-pin dock connector with the new, smaller ‘Lightning’ connector introduced with the iPhone 5 a month ago.

The US firm has now sold more than 100 million iPads since 2010 and had stuck with its 9.7in screen while rivals introduced lower-price tablets with smaller screens.

Amazon’s 7in Kindle Fire has proved popular and a new version was launched last month. A Google Nexus 7 using Android software and the Samsung Galaxy have also been successful.

Independent technology analyst Jeff Kagan said the new, smaller iPad was a gamble for Apple in that it risked cutting into sales of the original iPad.

“Yes this will cannibalise some of the iPad, but pull the camera back and you can see how it will increase the size of the Apple customer base,” he said.

“This will open up new segments of the market to Apple – segments that would like an Apple but which prefer a smaller screen or a lower price tag.”

The Verdict

Apple are so good at reinventing something which they’ve already invented…

Don’t get me wrong, I LOVE Apple products and if it was up to me I’d have a Mac Copmuter, iPad, iPhone 5, iPod and probably a few docking stations around the house. Sadly I’m not made of money – and as I’ve proven, neither are the majority of the UK.

It doesn’t stop me getting highly pissed off with Apple when they launch something new – which is technically the same bloody thing just either smaller or bigger than the last version. I’m all for amending and recreating, improving and moving forward, but Apple take the piss don’t you think?

First we had the iPod, the the iPod Nano, iPad, iPad mini, iPhone 3G, iPhone 3GS, iPhone 4, iPhone 4S, iPhone 5…………. what about Mac Book, Mac Book Pro, Mac Book Air, Mac Book friggin Lite…………..

Can you just fuck off with the whole reinventing what you’ve already invented and come up with something new and inspiring to make me WANT to buy your products – or at least save up for one. Thanks.

p.s. I do love the design work and simplicity – I’m just bored of the repetition (in case you didn’t get that).